I never meant to be offensive, sorry if that was the way you felt it.
But as anything touching democracy, that was reasonable writing. And the main problem I think is you distorted a lot my speech.

First of all, I have never written that women have no brain. On the contrary, it is well known that a woman's feeling of attraction is largely a matter of a brain conception. All the information collected by the senses are processed and culturally atoned to trigger the attractiveness.
So definitively, if a woman finds a man attractive, that's because she has a well working brain. I even think that the eldest of the democratic us journalists,a living legend and a very intelligent woman (I cant catch her name right now) also finds georges walker bush attractive.
The second point is that I have a big, big support in my statements. Nearly as good as the bible to tell everything. The founding fathers. The conception of those nearly supra human beings about the part of women in politics is somehow very close to mine so I feel really authorised to make it myself.

To finish with, I doubt you can say that democratic men think with their small head. For example, out of 44 democratic us presidents, it is very likely that there was no woman. If democratic men thought with their small head, there would have been much more.
In societies where women are given a broader access to power, maybe men think with their small head, in democratic countries, that's dubious.

Too bad georges walker bush isnt available, it could do you a lot of good...