look at the filename of the picture of bush and his wife at the cnn website for netscape: http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/ele...e=ne_election5

now tell me they are not biased.

What is impressive is how people have access to such kind of information.
In the amount of information flooding the net, it is very unlikely that everyone would check the name of an image to know the leanings of this or that media.
It is even more doubtful that the people in charge of cnn know about that, giving this initiative no more body than the one of an individual among many others.
Does this reflect an individual genuine perception of a person hostile to the president, a blink to a friendly communauty or is this a dirty trick from an infiltrated paid by a concurrent to act this way and broadcast the word to lead people think cnn is biased?

The point is that cant reflect the global way of thinking of a medium like cnn.

i dont like bush

__________________

I suppose the filename was changed, because I don't see what's wrong with georgelaura135.jpg

But anyway, I suppose you know that it's not "CNN" that set the filenames of this image but one single person put the article online.

This is always the way of doing of the leftists in the media. Their purpose is to manipulate.

This is working very well. I suppose Bush should have many more people supporting him as I cannot figure whatever else better some Gore or kelly would have done for the US, disregarding any political interest.

__________________
From SR

@janlefev

You never give it a rest, do you? When was the last time anybody agreed with you on this board? Don't bother looking it up, the answer is never. Why don't you go check on your friends over at fuckfrance.com ?

AND STAY THERE, YOU CREEP

:stupid:

This vid shows CNNs integrity, i think...

Jon Sewart on CNN's Crossfire