They have it so hard that they broadcast false tv shots showing the execution of a unarmed man.
Hopefully that's all fixed and easy to see.
Too bad ranger has gone. Could have explained it better.

whats the point..the election is over.

people bitch about every thing. i guess nowadays we have to ask people if they are going to kill us, before we even point a gun at them. It is pathetic.

__________________

Get me a hardtop with a decent engine, and make sure it's got a big trunk.

I would ask it if a guy had a gun and he was angry and moving toward me, reaching near his belt for his gun.

Wouldnt you?

... first thing I thought was: poor, unlucky solider is going to be convicted for murder and have his life completily destroyed, only because he unfortunately got taped while doing it. Not that I approve of shooting unarmed people, but this is war - it's not some kind of extraordinary and unlikely thing to happen. Not that this'll prevent the news- outlets from being suprised and shocked that an american solider could perform such an unspeakably terrible and barbaric act, of course. Perhaps Rumsfeld will eventually join in on that tune after his advisors have listened well to the "public opinion". I guess we'll just have to wait and see. I wonder what the headlines will be. Perhaps: "Rumsfeld express concern about overzealous soliders in the war- zone. -'It is now that I ask myself: can we maintain our facade of charitable altruism when our soliders must also do their job', Rumsfeld mused on the press conference".
The war isn't, though. Not that I didn't say that nothing mattered a day after the war started, of course, but everyone should have a hobby, right? Keeps me from throwing stink- bombs over the (presently very high and reinforced) fence at the local american embassy at least.

Nobody gets convicted for murder in democracy as long as one is smart enough to kill in the name of democratic values. On the contrary, people always give a compassionate look at those who commit such actions.
A fact is that never a democratic country has been convicted of actions against the convention of genevae because democratic people are just unable, by nature and definition, to kill in the way required to be sentenced.